On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:49PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
>
> The walk_iomem_res_desc(), walk_system_ram_res() and walk_system_ram_range()
> functions each have much of the same code. Create a new function that
> consolidates the common code from these functions in one place to reduce
> the amount of duplicated code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/resource.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 9b5f044..7b20b3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -397,9 +397,30 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res,
> unsigned long desc,
> res->start = p->start;
> if (res->end > p->end)
> res->end = p->end;
> + res->desc = p->desc;
> return 0;
I must be going blind: where are we using that res->desc?
> +static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
> + bool first_level_children_only,
Btw, that variable name is insanely long.
The rest looks ok to me, thanks for the cleanup!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284
(AG Nürnberg)
--
