Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 17:22:55 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
> This patch updates the dynamic-power-coefficient for big cluster on
> rk3399 SoCs.
> 
> The dynamic power consumption of the CPU is proportional to the square of
> the Voltage (V) and the clock frequency (f). The coefficient is used to
> calculate the dynamic power as below -
> Pdyn = dynamic-power-coefficient * V^2 * f
> Where Voltage is in uV, frequency is in MHz.
> 
> As the following is the tested data on rk3399's big cluster.
> frequency(MHz)  Voltage(V)  Current(mA) Dynamic-power-coefficient
> 24              0.8         15
> 48              0.8         23          ~417
> 96              0.8         40          ~443
> 216             0.8         82          ~438
> 312             0.8         115         ~430
> 408             0.8         150         ~455
> So the dynamic-power-coefficient average value is about 436.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <[email protected]>

applied for 4.14 and thanks for that very nice and informative commit
message explaining the testing methodology.


Heiko

> ---
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 9d02006..5d54a06 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
>                       enable-method = "psci";
>                       #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
>                       clocks = <&cru ARMCLKB>;
> -                     dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
> +                     dynamic-power-coefficient = <436>;
>               };
>  
>               cpu_b1: cpu@101 {
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
>                       reg = <0x0 0x101>;
>                       enable-method = "psci";
>                       clocks = <&cru ARMCLKB>;
> -                     dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
> +                     dynamic-power-coefficient = <436>;
>               };
>       };
>  
> 


Reply via email to