2017-08-01 19:04 GMT+02:00  <[email protected]>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 7:37 AM
>> To: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>; Platform Driver <platform-driver-
>> [email protected]>; Darren Hart <[email protected]>; LKML <linux-
>> [email protected]>; Linux ACPI <[email protected]>; Andy
>> Shevchenko <[email protected]>; Jérôme de Bretagne
>> <[email protected]>; Limonciello, Mario
>> <[email protected]>; Alex Hung <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from
>> suspend-to-idle
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> On Friday, July 28, 2017 02:06:36 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> >>> Please note that this change is requisite for
>> >>>
>> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9873159/
>> >>>
>> >>> so are there any objections or concerns?
>> >>
>> >> Not from my side,
>> >>
>> >> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > OK, thanks!
>> >
>> > I'm going to route it through the PM tree then if that's not a problem.
>>
>> Mario, are you okay with this change?
>>
>
> Thanks for checking.  I spent a little time this morning trying to walk 
> through
> the ASL as attached to the Bugzilla entry and I think this is the correct 
> approach.
>
> Acked-By: Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
>
> Jérôme,
> I have one question though.  These events should be happening as a pair.
> Press: 0xCE, Release: 0xCF.
> What happens with the event on power button release?
> Is that showing a message in the log during wakeup from S2I?
>
> Something like "unknown event 0xCF"?

Mario, I confirm that I can see such release events in the logs:

   intel-hid INT33D5:00: unknown event 0xcf

during wakeup from suspend-to-idle.

> If so, it would be good to also catch and ignore that too.
>
> Thanks,

Reply via email to