> > + /*
> > + * For unprivileged mounts use current uid/gid. Still allow
> > + * "user_id" and "group_id" options for compatibility, but
> > + * only if they match these values.
> > + */
> > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> > + d->user_id = current->uid;
> > + d->user_id_present = 1;
> > + d->group_id = current->gid;
> > + d->group_id_present = 1;
> > +
> > + }
>
> CAP_SETUID is the appropriate capability...
>
> This is not a dimension we have not fully explored.
> What is the problem with a user controlled mount having different
> uid and gid values.
>
> Yes they map into different users but how is this a problem.
> The only problem that I can recall is the historic chown problem
> where you could give files to other users and mess up their quotas.
>
> Or is the problem other users writing to this user controlled
> filesystem?
Yes. Or even just a suid process trying to access the user controlled
filesystem. See Documentation/filesystems/fuse.txt for the gory
details.
Eric, thanks for the detailed review :)
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
