4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com>
commit c13c43d54f2c6a3be1c675766778ac1ad8dfbfcc upstream.
btt_rw_page was not propagating errors frm btt_do_bvec, resulting in any
IO errors via the rw_page path going unnoticed. the pmem driver recently
fixed this in e10624f pmem: fail io-requests to known bad blocks
but same problem in BTT went neglected.
Fixes: 5212e11fde4d ("nd_btt: atomic sector updates")
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hpe.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/nvdimm/btt.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/btt.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/btt.c
@@ -1205,10 +1205,13 @@ static int btt_rw_page(struct block_devi
struct page *page, int rw)
{
struct btt *btt = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
+ int rc;
- btt_do_bvec(btt, NULL, page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, 0, rw, sector);
- page_endio(page, rw & WRITE, 0);
- return 0;
+ rc = btt_do_bvec(btt, NULL, page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, 0, rw, sector);
+ if (rc == 0)
+ page_endio(page, rw & WRITE, 0);
+
+ return rc;
}
