On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 07:12 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:39:35PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > Well, we did talk a lot about your suggested name, > > "acpi_blacklist", and I explained that it did not work since it'd > > be used for both black and white-list. We've agreed on that. > > > > You then suggested it's "platform", not "OEM". Since this is an > > ACPI structure defined in "acpi.h", its terminology generally > > follows ACPI spec, which I did. > > > > I understand that you feel strongly against "OEM" (sorry about > > that). How about "acpi_platform_list"? Does it work for you? > > Yes, I thought we agreed on all that.
Sounds good. Will change to "acpi_platform_list". Thanks, -Toshi
