On 2017/8/8 15:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/08/2017 06:05, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> index cd0e6e6..dec5e8a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> switch (code) {
>> case HVCALL_NOTIFY_LONG_SPIN_WAIT:
>> - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
>> + kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_x86_ops->spin_in_kernel(vcpu));
>> break;
>> case HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE:
>> case HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT:
>
> This can be true as well. I can change this on commit.
>
Thanks,
hope you could help me to fix the same problem in patch-1(s390) too.
> Paolo
>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)
