4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>

commit 9d95aa4bada24be35bb94827a55e1d6e243d866e upstream.

In the non-cooperative userfaultfd case, the process exit may race with
outstanding mcopy_atomic called by the uffd monitor.  Returning -ENOSPC
instead of -EINVAL when mm is already gone will allow uffd monitor to
distinguish this case from other error conditions.

Unfortunately I overlooked userfaultfd_zeropage when updating
userfaultd_copy().

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 96333187ab162 ("userfaultfd_copy: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/userfaultfd.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1645,6 +1645,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct u
                ret = mfill_zeropage(ctx->mm, uffdio_zeropage.range.start,
                                     uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
                mmput(ctx->mm);
+       } else {
+               return -ENOSPC;
        }
        if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
                return -EFAULT;


Reply via email to