On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:11:14AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific > properties. > > Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvu...@ti.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95 > +++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt > index 18090e7226b4..05fe2931d025 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt > @@ -9,7 +9,12 @@ execute the actual DMA tansfer. > eDMA3 Channel Controller > > Required properties: > -- compatible: "ti,edma3-tpcc" for the channel controller(s) > +-------------------- > +- compatible: Should be: > + - "ti,edma3-tpcc" for the channel controller(s) on OMAP, > + AM33xx and AM43xx SoCs. > + - "ti,k2g-edma3-tpcc", "ti,edma3-tpcc" for the
If power-domains is mandatory, I don't think the fallback is appropriate. Or do you expect it to work if the driver ignores the power domain?
