On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:23:56 +0200
Andreas Klinger <a...@it-klinger.de> wrote:

> Ultrasonic sensor srf10 is quite similar to srf08 and now also supported by
> the driver as device tree compatible string.
> 
> The most significiant difference is a different range and values of
> register gain (in the driver it's call sensitivity). Therefore the array of
> was extended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <a...@it-klinger.de>
Minor issue inline.  Otherwise looks fine.

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c | 59 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> index 49316cbf7c60..350b5b0eb64e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> @@ -30,14 +30,23 @@
>  
>  #define SRF08_CMD_RANGING_CM 0x51    /* Ranging Mode - Result in cm */
>  
> -#define SRF08_DEFAULT_GAIN   1025    /* default analogue value of Gain */
> +//#define SRF08_DEFAULT_GAIN 1025    /* default analogue value of Gain */
checkpatch.pl would have picked up on this.  Don't leave random dead code
in here...
>  #define SRF08_DEFAULT_RANGE  6020    /* default value of Range in mm */
>  
> +#define SRF08_MAX_SENSITIVITY        32      /* number of Gain Register 
> values */
> +
> +enum srf08_sensor_type {
> +     SRF08,
> +     SRF10,
> +     SRF_MAX_TYPE
> +};
> +
>  struct srf08_data {
>       struct i2c_client       *client;
>       int                     sensitivity;            /* Gain */
>       int                     range_mm;               /* max. Range in mm */
>       struct mutex            lock;
> +     enum srf08_sensor_type  sensor_type;            /* Sensor-Type */
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -47,11 +56,29 @@ struct srf08_data {
>   * But with ADC's this term is already used differently and that's why it
>   * is called "Sensitivity" here.
>   */
> -static const int srf08_sensitivity[] = {
> +static const int srf08_sensitivity[SRF_MAX_TYPE][SRF08_MAX_SENSITIVITY] = {
> +     /* SRF08 */
> +     {
>        94,  97, 100, 103, 107, 110, 114, 118,
>       123, 128, 133, 139, 145, 152, 159, 168,
>       177, 187, 199, 212, 227, 245, 265, 288,
> -     317, 352, 395, 450, 524, 626, 777, 1025 };
> +     317, 352, 395, 450, 524, 626, 777, 1025
> +     },
> +     /* SRF10 */
> +     {
> +      40,  40,  50,  60,  70,  80, 100, 120,
> +     140, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 500, 600,
> +     700,   0,   0,   0,   0,   0,   0,   0,
> +       0,   0,   0,   0,   0,   0,   0,   0,
> +     },
> +};
> +
> +static const int srf08_default_sensitivity[SRF_MAX_TYPE] = {
> +     /* SRF08 */
> +     1025,
> +     /* SRF10 */
> +     700,
> +};
>  
>  static int srf08_read_ranging(struct srf08_data *data)
>  {
> @@ -225,9 +252,13 @@ static ssize_t srf08_show_sensitivity_available(struct 
> device *dev,
>                               struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>       int i, len = 0;
> +     struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> +     struct srf08_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity); i++)
> -             len += sprintf(buf + len, "%d ", srf08_sensitivity[i]);
> +     for (i = 0; i < SRF08_MAX_SENSITIVITY; i++)
> +             if (srf08_sensitivity[data->sensor_type][i])
> +                     len += sprintf(buf + len, "%d ",
> +                             srf08_sensitivity[data->sensor_type][i]);
>  
>       len += sprintf(buf + len, "\n");
>  
> @@ -256,13 +287,16 @@ static ssize_t srf08_write_sensitivity(struct 
> srf08_data *data,
>       int ret, i;
>       u8 regval;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity); i++)
> -             if (val == srf08_sensitivity[i]) {
> +     if (!val)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < SRF08_MAX_SENSITIVITY; i++)
> +             if (val == srf08_sensitivity[data->sensor_type][i]) {
>                       regval = i;
>                       break;
>               }
>  
> -     if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(srf08_sensitivity))
> +     if (i >= SRF08_MAX_SENSITIVITY)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> @@ -352,8 +386,9 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>       data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>       i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
>       data->client = client;
> +     data->sensor_type = (enum srf08_sensor_type)id->driver_data;
>  
> -     indio_dev->name = "srf08";
> +     indio_dev->name = id->name;
>       indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev;
>       indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>       indio_dev->info = &srf08_info;
> @@ -371,7 +406,8 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> -     ret = srf08_write_sensitivity(data, SRF08_DEFAULT_GAIN);
> +     ret = srf08_write_sensitivity(data,
> +                     srf08_default_sensitivity[id->driver_data]);
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> @@ -379,7 +415,8 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  }
>  
>  static const struct i2c_device_id srf08_id[] = {
> -     { "srf08", 0 },
> +     { "srf08", SRF08 },
> +     { "srf10", SRF10 },
>       { }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, srf08_id);

Reply via email to