On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:38:08PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote: > > It doesn't make sense to use include/linux/i2c for client drivers which may > > in > > fact rather be hwmon or input or whatever devices. As a result, I want to > > deprecate include/linux/i2c for good. This series moves the include files > > to a > > better location, largely include/linux/platform_data because that is what > > most > > of the moved include files contain. Please let me know if you think another > > location is more suitable. > > > > I prefer the series to go upstream via the subsystem tree; if you prefer > > that I > > take it via I2C, just let me know. > > I don't think it makes sense to take this through the drm/gma500 since > it's platform data and does not really touch any gma500 specifics. > What makes sense for I2C/platform is probably more important here.
Ok, thank you for the info! I will pick it then. > > No runtime testing because of no HW, but buildbot is happy with this series > > at > > least. A branch can be found here: > > Not sure anybody have hardware to test mdfld + tc358765. Perhaps some > smartphone exists but I've never seen one. There seems to be an upstream user: arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_tc35876x.c > FWIW, for the small gma500 change you have my: > > Acked-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobs...@gmail.com> Thanks again, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
