> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Talpey > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 2:07 PM > To: Long Li <[email protected]>; Steve French <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [[PATCH v1] 24/37] [CIFS] SMBD: Support for SMBD keep alive > protocol > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-cifs- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Long Li > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 4:11 PM > > To: Steve French <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > samba- [email protected]; [email protected] > > Cc: Long Li <[email protected]> > > Subject: [[PATCH v1] 24/37] [CIFS] SMBD: Support for SMBD keep alive > > protocol > > > > SMBD uses a keep alive protocol to help peers detect if the remote is dead. > > When peer request keep alive, the transport needs to respond accordingly. > > The keepalive exchange is also used to replenish credits in certain > pathological conditions. > > > + // send an emtpy response right away if requested > > + if (le16_to_cpu(data_transfer->flags) | > > + le16_to_cpu(SMB_DIRECT_RESPONSE_REQUESTED)) > > { > > + info->keep_alive_requested = KEEP_ALIVE_PENDING; > > + } > > This is clearly a typo, the condition is always true. "&"??
Sorry it's a typo. > > Tom.
