On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:42:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I'm not saying it's a replacement for the run time random generator, but > it's exceptionally good and reasonably fast for the early boot > randomization.
... which suffices our purposes. It's not like we're going to generate long-term key pairs with it. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.