On Tue 15-08-17 21:58:29, Tetsuo Handa wrote: [...] > If I apply this patch, I can no longer reproduce this problem even with btrfs. > > -+ * and could cause a memory corruption (zero pages instead of the > -+ * original content). > ++ * and could cause a memory corruption (random content instead of the > ++ * original content).
If anything then I would word it this way and could cause a memory corruption (zero pages for refaults but even a random content has been observed but never explained properly) > Tested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Thanks -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
