On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 18:50 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > (And guess what, it uses APM and suspend is really faster and way more > > reliable than each kernel implementation I could try). > > If you tried Suspend2 and had problems with reliability, please send me > logs. I'll do all I can to help. (I have to qualify it a bit, because > I'm not able to fix drivers, but if it's a Suspend2 issue, tell me and > I'll fix it).
Does suspend2 work with APM ? After much trying, I think now the ACPI implementation of my laptop (a vintage Compaq Armada 1700) is busted, only APM works. AFAIR the problem with suspend2 was that it didn't poweroff some parts of the laptop (the led of the wifi pcmcia card was on, and the lcd light was on too), but that was last year. Kernel's suspend kind of worked but didn't resume (no reaction on button press). As I tried all this last year, I may have forgotten some things. Honestly, I like this laptop when it works flawlessly, so I don't see many reasons to try *susp* again. I'll do it when I'm bored, just not today. Thanks, Xav - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/