3.2.92-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>

commit 245b2eecee2aac6fdc77dcafaa73c33f9644c3c7 upstream.

While stress testing a usb controller using a bind/unbind looop, the
following error loop was observed.

usb 7-1.2: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci-hcd
usb 7-1.2: hub failed to enable device, error -108
usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
usb 7-1-port2: couldn't allocate usb_device
usb 7-1-port2: cannot disable (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -22)
** 57 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: activate --> -22
** 82 printk messages dropped ** hub 7-1:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = 
-22)

This continues forever. After adding tracebacks into the code,
the call sequence leading to this is found to be as follows.

[<ffffffc0007fc8e0>] hub_activate+0x368/0x7b8
[<ffffffc0007fceb4>] hub_resume+0x2c/0x3c
[<ffffffc00080b3b8>] usb_resume_interface.isra.6+0x128/0x158
[<ffffffc00080b5d0>] usb_suspend_both+0x1e8/0x288
[<ffffffc00080c9c4>] usb_runtime_suspend+0x3c/0x98
[<ffffffc0007820a0>] __rpm_callback+0x48/0x7c
[<ffffffc00078217c>] rpm_callback+0xa8/0xd4
[<ffffffc000786234>] rpm_suspend+0x84/0x758
[<ffffffc000786ca4>] rpm_idle+0x2c8/0x498
[<ffffffc000786ed4>] __pm_runtime_idle+0x60/0xac
[<ffffffc00080eba8>] usb_autopm_put_interface+0x6c/0x7c
[<ffffffc000803798>] hub_event+0x10ac/0x12ac
[<ffffffc000249bb8>] process_one_work+0x390/0x6b8
[<ffffffc00024abcc>] worker_thread+0x480/0x610
[<ffffffc000251a80>] kthread+0x164/0x178
[<ffffffc0002045d0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40

kick_hub_wq() is called from hub_activate() even after failures to
communicate with the hub. This results in an endless sequence of
hub event -> hub activate -> wq trigger -> hub event -> ...

Provide two solutions for the problem.

- Only trigger the hub event queue if communication with the hub
  is successful.
- After a suspend failure, only resume already suspended interfaces
  if the communication with the device is still possible.

Each of the changes fixes the observed problem. Use both to improve
robustness.

Acked-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c    |  5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
@@ -1218,6 +1218,24 @@ static int usb_suspend_both(struct usb_d
                 */
                if (udev->parent && !PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
                        status = 0;
+
+               /*
+                * If the device is inaccessible, don't try to resume
+                * suspended interfaces and just return the error.
+                */
+               if (status && status != -EBUSY) {
+                       int err;
+                       u16 devstat;
+
+                       err = usb_get_status(udev, USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0,
+                                            &devstat);
+                       if (err) {
+                               dev_err(&udev->dev,
+                                       "Failed to suspend device, error %d\n",
+                                       status);
+                               goto done;
+                       }
+               }
        }
 
        /* If the suspend failed, resume interfaces that did get suspended */
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -884,6 +884,9 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub
 
                portstatus = portchange = 0;
                status = hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus, &portchange);
+               if (status)
+                       goto abort;
+
                if (udev || (portstatus & USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
                        dev_dbg(hub->intfdev,
                                        "port %d: status %04x change %04x\n",
@@ -1011,7 +1014,7 @@ static void hub_activate(struct usb_hub
 
        /* Scan all ports that need attention */
        kick_khubd(hub);
-
+ abort:
        /* Allow autosuspend if it was suppressed */
        if (type <= HUB_INIT3)
                usb_autopm_put_interface_async(to_usb_interface(hub->intfdev));

Reply via email to