On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 22:55 +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> Fernando Luis =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1zquez?= Cao (on Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:13:28 
> +0900) wrote:
> >+static __inline__ unsigned long safe_apic_wait_icr_idle(void)
> >+{
> >+    unsigned long send_status;
> >+    int timeout;
> >+
> >+    timeout = 0;
> >+    do {
> >+            udelay(100);
> >+            send_status = apic_read(APIC_ICR) & APIC_ICR_BUSY;
> >+    } while (send_status && (timeout++ < 1000));
> >+
> >+    return send_status;
> >+}
> >+
> 
> safe_apic_wait_icr_idle() as coded guarantees a minimum 100 usec delay
> before sending the IPI, this extra delay is unnecessary.  Change it to
Hi Keith,

Thank you for the feedback!

>       do {
>               send_status = apic_read(APIC_ICR) & APIC_ICR_BUSY;
>               if (send_status)
>                       break;
>               udelay(100);
>       } while (timeout++ < 1000);
Oops, that is a good point. I will resend this patch either tonight or
tomorrow morning.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to