> so if I find HITM with this flag set I should count it
> as remote HITM then? something like attached.. untested
You mean for c2c? Yes looks reasonable.
-Andi
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> index 06f5a3a4295c..65e22b9e59f9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ int c2c_decode_stats(struct c2c_stats *stats, struct
> mem_info *mi)
> u64 lvl = data_src->mem_lvl;
> u64 snoop = data_src->mem_snoop;
> u64 lock = data_src->mem_lock;
> + bool mr = data_src->mem_remote;
> int err = 0;
>
> #define HITM_INC(__f) \
> @@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ do { \
> }
>
> if ((lvl & P(LVL, REM_RAM1)) ||
> - (lvl & P(LVL, REM_RAM2))) {
> + (lvl & P(LVL, REM_RAM2)) || mr) {
> stats->rmt_dram++;
> if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HIT))
> stats->ld_shared++;
> @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ do { \
> }
>
> if ((lvl & P(LVL, REM_CCE1)) ||
> - (lvl & P(LVL, REM_CCE2))) {
> + (lvl & P(LVL, REM_CCE2)) || mr) {
> if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HIT))
> stats->rmt_hit++;
> else if (snoop & P(SNOOP, HITM))
>
