On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:23:33PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> You see? Kernel_thread does not check is sys_clone() worked! Aha,
"=&a" (retval)
> caller is responsible for that, but init/main.c does not seem too
> carefull. Maybe kernel_thread should at least print a warning?
If clone fails during start_kernel that's the last of your problems so nobody
cared. If you want to add a check on the retval go ahead, that's right indeed.
> Plus, can someone explain me why it does not need to setup %%ecx with
> either zero or address of stack?
Not necessary because a kernel thread never exit from kernel.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
