On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:15 +0200 > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > trace_deferred_error_apic_entry(DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR); > > - __smp_deferred_error_interrupt(); > > + inc_irq_stat(irq_deferred_error_count); > > Here we do the inc_irq_stat() after the tracepoint (same as the > original). > > entering_irq(); > > + inc_irq_stat(irq_thermal_count); > > trace_thermal_apic_entry(THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR); > > Here we do the inc_irq_stat() after the tracepoint (swapped from the > original). Was that intentional?
No. Not that it matters at all, but I can make it consistent everywhere.
