On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:16 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:

> -static inline void __smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
> -{
> -     generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
> -     inc_irq_stat(irq_call_count);

Interesting. The origin code calls the
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() and then calls inc_irq_stat().
Not sure it matters, but just stating this because...

>  }
>  
>  __visible void __irq_entry smp_call_function_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>       ipi_entering_ack_irq();
> -     __smp_call_function_interrupt();
> -     exiting_irq();
> -}
> -
> -__visible void __irq_entry
> -smp_trace_call_function_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> -     ipi_entering_ack_irq();
>       trace_call_function_entry(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
> -     __smp_call_function_interrupt();
> -     trace_call_function_exit(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
> -     exiting_irq();
> -}
> -
> -static inline void __smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
> -{
> -     generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
>       inc_irq_stat(irq_call_count);
> -}
> -
> -__visible void __irq_entry
> -smp_call_function_single_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> -     ipi_entering_ack_irq();
> -     __smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
> +     generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();

here and

> +     trace_call_function_exit(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
>       exiting_irq();
>  }
>  
> -__visible void __irq_entry
> -smp_trace_call_function_single_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +__visible void __irq_entry smp_call_function_single_interrupt(struct pt_regs 
> *r)
>  {
>       ipi_entering_ack_irq();
>       trace_call_function_single_entry(CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR);
> -     __smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
> +     inc_irq_stat(irq_call_count);
> +     generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();

here, you reverse it.

Should at least be mentioned in the change log.

-- Steve

>       trace_call_function_single_exit(CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR);
>       exiting_irq();
>  }
> 

Reply via email to