On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:18 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> No more users of the tracing idt. All exception tracepoints have been moved > into the regular handlers. Get rid of the mess which shouldn't have been > created in the first place. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > --- > arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 12 ----- > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 13 ------ > arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 82 > ++------------------------------------ > arch/x86/include/asm/entry_arch.h | 14 ++---- > arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 20 --------- > arch/x86/include/asm/segment.h | 3 - > arch/x86/kernel/tracepoint.c | 43 ------------------- > arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 6 -- > 8 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 179 deletions(-) > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/entry_arch.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/entry_arch.h > @@ -13,20 +13,16 @@ > BUILD_INTERRUPT(reschedule_interrupt,RESCHEDULE_VECTOR) > BUILD_INTERRUPT(call_function_interrupt,CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR) > BUILD_INTERRUPT(call_function_single_interrupt,CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR) > -BUILD_INTERRUPT3(irq_move_cleanup_interrupt, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR, > - smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt) > -BUILD_INTERRUPT3(reboot_interrupt, REBOOT_VECTOR, smp_reboot_interrupt) > +BUILD_INTERRUPT(irq_move_cleanup_interrupt, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR) > +BUILD_INTERRUPT(reboot_interrupt, REBOOT_VECTOR) > #endif > > BUILD_INTERRUPT(x86_platform_ipi, X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR) > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM > -BUILD_INTERRUPT3(kvm_posted_intr_ipi, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, > - smp_kvm_posted_intr_ipi) > -BUILD_INTERRUPT3(kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi, POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, > - smp_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi) > -BUILD_INTERRUPT3(kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi, POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, > - smp_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi) > +BUILD_INTERRUPT(kvm_posted_intr_ipi, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR) > +BUILD_INTERRUPT(kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi, POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR) > +BUILD_INTERRUPT(kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi, POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR) > #endif This looks like a different change than what is specified in the change log. It looks like a clean up. Shouldn't it be a separate patch? -- Steve
