On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 10:45 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > I'd argue that Brendan's patch should go in for-current as well, > > because it fixes a divisor rounding error for the ast2500 (bus is > > clocked faster than requested). > > Hmmm, pity, the description said "potential" issue so I decided for > for-next. However, I wouldn't like to reshuffle my branches much so > short before the merge window. So, would it be OK with you that you send > both patches to stable after rc1? >
Will do. Cheers, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
