From: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> We are taking wrong index (+1) for first thread, which leaves thread with index 0 unused and uninitialized.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> Cc: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170824162737.7813-7-jo...@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> --- tools/perf/util/values.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/values.c b/tools/perf/util/values.c index 5de2e15e2eda..9ac36bf2c438 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/values.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/values.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int perf_read_values__findnew_thread(struct perf_read_values *values, return i; } - i = values->threads + 1; + i = values->threads; values->value[i] = malloc(values->counters_max * sizeof(**values->value)); if (!values->value[i]) { pr_debug("failed to allocate read_values counters array"); @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int perf_read_values__findnew_thread(struct perf_read_values *values, } values->pid[i] = pid; values->tid[i] = tid; - values->threads = i; + values->threads = i + 1; return i; } -- 2.13.5
