Hello, On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:27:55PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > The following patch was sent a while back by Wolfgang Bumiller to remap > cpusets > for a whole subtree in a cgroup v1 cpuset hierarchy. The fact that currently > this is not possible in a non-racy why is a pretty big limitation. This is > especially true for nested containers. Where the nested containers often > create > additional subcgroups in the cpuset controller at will. The fact that you > can't > *easily* and in a non-racy way tighten the restriction on them after having > created the parent container's cpuset cgroup seems really troubling.
There was a recent patch to enable v2 behavior on v1, which feels like the better approach at this point. I'm not sure about adding a whole new interface for this. Thanks. -- tejun
