On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:46:54AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:58:34AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote: > > OpenRISC only supports hardware instructions that perform 4 byte atomic > > operations. For enabling qrwlocks for upcoming SMP support 1 and 2 byte > > implementations are needed. To do this we leverage the 4 byte atomic > > operations and shift/mask the 1 and 2 byte areas as needed. > > > > This heavily borrows ideas and routines from sh and mips, which do > > something similar. > > Is there value in lifting them into something common?
Actually, I was planning on that as a followup patch series. Also, the timer sync patch [13/13] could me made common which is on my todo list.