Previously, we will miss merging flush command during fsync due to below
race condition:

Thread A                Thread B                Thread C
- f2fs_issue_flush
 - atomic_read(&issing_flush)
                        - f2fs_issue_flush
                         - atomic_read(&issing_flush)
                                                - f2fs_issue_flush
                                                 - atomic_read(&issing_flush)
  - atomic_inc(&issing_flush)
                          - atomic_inc(&issing_flush)
                                                  - atomic_inc(&issing_flush)
   - submit_flush_wait
                           - submit_flush_wait
                                                   - submit_flush_wait

It needs to use atomic_inc_return instead to avoid such race.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index d6c3f456ea51..1215ca1bd4e2 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -536,8 +536,7 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
                return ret;
        }
 
-       if (!atomic_read(&fcc->issing_flush)) {
-               atomic_inc(&fcc->issing_flush);
+       if (atomic_inc_return(&fcc->issing_flush) == 1) {
                ret = submit_flush_wait(sbi);
                atomic_dec(&fcc->issing_flush);
 
@@ -547,7 +546,6 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 
        init_completion(&cmd.wait);
 
-       atomic_inc(&fcc->issing_flush);
        llist_add(&cmd.llnode, &fcc->issue_list);
 
        /* update issue_list before we wake up issue_flush thread */
-- 
2.13.1.388.g69e6b9b4f4a9

Reply via email to