class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).

Also rename of_find_mux_chip_by_node to of_get_mux_chip_by_node to
make it clear that it returns a reference.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mux/core.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mux/core.c b/drivers/mux/core.c
index 7aa656ac8fb5..8864cc745506 100644
--- a/drivers/mux/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, const void 
*data)
        return dev->of_node == data;
 }
 
-static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+static struct mux_chip *of_get_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 {
        struct device *dev;
 
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static struct mux_control *of_mux_control_get(struct device 
*dev,
                return ERR_PTR(ret);
        }
 
-       mux_chip = of_find_mux_chip_by_node(args.np);
+       mux_chip = of_get_mux_chip_by_node(args.np);
        of_node_put(args.np);
        if (!mux_chip)
                return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ static struct mux_control *of_mux_control_get(struct device 
*dev,
            (!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
                dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
                        np, args.np);
+               put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
        }
 
@@ -490,10 +491,10 @@ static struct mux_control *of_mux_control_get(struct 
device *dev,
        if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
                dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
                        np, controller, args.np);
+               put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
        }
 
-       get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
        return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
 }
 
-- 
2.13.4

Reply via email to