On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: x86/idt: Fix the X86_TRAP_BP gate
> From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> 
> Andrei Vagin reported a CRIU regression and bisected it back to:
> 
>   90f6225fba0c ("x86/idt: Move IST stack based traps to table init")
> 
> This table init conversion loses the system-gate property of X86_TRAP_BP
> and erroneously moves it from DPL3 to DPL0.

Duh, yes. Thanks for spotting it.

> Fix it.
> 
> Reported-by: Andrei Vagin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 6 +++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/idt.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: tip/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> +++ tip/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ struct idt_data {
>  #define ISTG(_vector, _addr, _ist)                   \
>       G(_vector, _addr, _ist, GATE_INTERRUPT, DPL0, __KERNEL_CS)
>  
> +/* System interrupt gate with interrupt stack */
> +#define SISTG(_vector, _addr, _ist)                  \
> +     G(_vector, _addr, _ist, GATE_INTERRUPT, DPL3, __KERNEL_CS)
> +
>  /* Task gate */
>  #define TSKG(_vector, _gdt)                          \
>       G(_vector, NULL, DEFAULT_STACK, GATE_TASK, DPL0, _gdt << 3)
> @@ -181,7 +185,7 @@ gate_desc debug_idt_table[IDT_ENTRIES] _
>  static const __initdata struct idt_data ist_idts[] = {
>       ISTG(X86_TRAP_DB,       debug,          DEBUG_STACK),
>       ISTG(X86_TRAP_NMI,      nmi,            NMI_STACK),
> -     ISTG(X86_TRAP_BP,       int3,           DEBUG_STACK),
> +     SISTG(X86_TRAP_BP,      int3,           DEBUG_STACK),
>       ISTG(X86_TRAP_DF,       double_fault,   DOUBLEFAULT_STACK),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
>       ISTG(X86_TRAP_MC,       &machine_check, MCE_STACK),
> 

Reply via email to