On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 10:08 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Drop the header and numbering of types. This format was confusing as > it suggested one could pass the number instead of the type name, > however it did not actually work, and numbering wasn't stable anyway.
<shrug> If it makes you happy. I suppose a bigger improvement would be to detail the purpose of each type. Most are fairly obvious, some like MEMSET are a bit obscure. Another defect: The list also includes types that are commented out.
