On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.fors...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:32:46PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The 2.26 release of glibc changed how siginfo_t is defined, and the earlier
>> work-around to using the kernel definition are no longer needed. The old
>> way needs to stay around for a while, though.
>>
>> Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.fors...@canonical.com>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
>> Cc: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> Seth, can you double check this to confirm it works for you too? This builds
>> and tests correctly for me on both Ubuntu 17.10 (-proposed) with glibc 2.26
>> and with earlier distros with 2.24, etc.
>
> It builds and tests correctly for me too, with both glibc 2.26 and 2.24.
>
> Tested-by: Seth Forshee <seth.fors...@canonical.com>

Awesome, thanks!

Shuah, is it possible to land this for v4.14? If it has to wait,
that's probably okay, as I've marked it for -stable, so it'll get
where it needs to be eventually. :)

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Reply via email to