Unlikely, but we could have ui_progress__init being called with total < 16, which would set the next and step variables to 0. That would force unnecessary ui_progress__ops->update calls because 'next' would never raise.
Forcing the next and step values to be always > 0. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> --- tools/perf/ui/progress.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c index a0f24c7115c5..a9c15804b1f6 100644 --- a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c +++ b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void ui_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p, u64 adv) void ui_progress__init(struct ui_progress *p, u64 total, const char *title) { p->curr = 0; - p->next = p->step = total / 16; + p->next = p->step = total / 16 ?: 1; p->total = total; p->title = title; -- 2.9.5
