3.2.93-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]> commit a3641631d14571242eec0d30c9faa786cbf52d44 upstream. If "i" is the last element in the vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[] array, it potentially can be exploited the vulnerability. this will out-of-bounds read and write. Luckily, the effect is small: /* when no next entry is found, the current entry[i] is reselected */ for (j = i + 1; ; j = (j + 1) % nent) { struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j]; if (ej->function == e->function) { It reads ej->maxphyaddr, which is user controlled. However... ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT; After cpuid_entries there is int maxphyaddr; struct x86_emulate_ctxt emulate_ctxt; /* 16-byte aligned */ So we have: - cpuid_entries at offset 1B50 (6992) - maxphyaddr at offset 27D0 (6992 + 3200 = 10192) - padding at 27D4...27DF - emulate_ctxt at 27E0 And it writes in the padding. Pfew, writing the ops field of emulate_ctxt would have been much worse. This patch fixes it by modding the index to avoid the out-of-bounds access. Worst case, i == j and ej->function == e->function, the loop can bail out. Reported-by: Moguofang <[email protected]> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Cc: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]> Cc: Guofang Mo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust filename] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -5450,18 +5450,20 @@ int emulator_fix_hypercall(struct x86_em static int move_to_next_stateful_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i) { struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[i]; - int j, nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent; + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej; + int j = i; + int nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent; e->flags &= ~KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT; /* when no next entry is found, the current entry[i] is reselected */ - for (j = i + 1; ; j = (j + 1) % nent) { - struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j]; - if (ej->function == e->function) { - ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT; - return j; - } - } - return 0; /* silence gcc, even though control never reaches here */ + do { + j = (j + 1) % nent; + ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j]; + } while (ej->function != e->function); + + ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT; + + return j; } /* find an entry with matching function, matching index (if needed), and that
