Hi Florian,
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > srchash = hash_by_src(net,
>> >
>> > &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple);
>> > - spin_lock_bh(&nf_nat_lock);
>> > + lock = &nf_nat_locks[srchash % ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks)];
>> > + spin_lock_bh(lock);
>>
>> If no spinlock debugging options (CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK,
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) are enabled on a UP platform
>> (e.g. m68k defconfig), arch_spinlock_t is an empty struct, and thus
>> ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks)] is zero, leading to:
>>
>> net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c: In function ‘nf_nat_setup_info’:
>> net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:432: warning: division by zero
>
> Gah. Sorry. This is the 2nd time I add such a bug :(
>
> Can you send a patch? It should be enough to use CONNTRACK_LOCKS
> instead of ARRAY_SIZE(nf_nat_locks) to avoid this problem.
>
> Otherwise I will take care of this next thing monday morning.
Thanks for the suggestion, will send a patch RSN.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
