Krzysztof Halasa wrote: [] > We've got stable series. > With KNOWN_PROBLEMS information, sysadmins can decide if they can > safely upgrade to .0 or if they have to wait for .123. Pressing > the responsible people to fix the problems in .123 (would) help > it greatly.
For how long you plan to maintain 2.6.x.y -stable series for each 2.6.x release? The thing is that tehere will probably be NO .123 "revision" (with maybe the exception of 2.6.16, thanks to Adrian again). The end result is that there will be just no stable kernels *at all*. because when the next 2.6.x will start looking more or less useful due to 2.6.x.y series, there will be new 2.6.x+1, and work with 2.6.x stops... It's not the case currently, but this way ("let's fix the bugs in 2.6.x.y -stable series, don't bother releasing 2.6.x in a good shape"), we can finally come to the above situation... /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/