When looking for unused xbar_out lane we should also protect the set_bit()
call with the same mutex to protect against concurrent threads picking the
same ID.

Fixes: ec9bfa1e1a796 ("dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: dra7: Use bitops instead of 
idr")
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
index 10ef9d5d5a66..7df910e7c348 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
@@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static void *ti_dra7_xbar_route_allocate(struct 
of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
        mutex_lock(&xbar->mutex);
        map->xbar_out = find_first_zero_bit(xbar->dma_inuse,
                                            xbar->dma_requests);
-       mutex_unlock(&xbar->mutex);
        if (map->xbar_out == xbar->dma_requests) {
+               mutex_unlock(&xbar->mutex);
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Run out of free DMA requests\n");
                kfree(map);
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
        }
        set_bit(map->xbar_out, xbar->dma_inuse);
+       mutex_unlock(&xbar->mutex);
 
        map->xbar_in = (u16)dma_spec->args[0];
 
-- 
2.14.1


Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. 
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki


Reply via email to