Le Sunday 29 April 2007 13:18:31 Jiri Kosina, vous avez écrit :
>
> Hi Vincent,
Hi Jiri,
>
> yes, the device is messed up, but it shouldn't have any consequences for
> you - the HID driver is able to correctly handle that, so as soon as we
> don't need to add any extra quirks for such device, everything should be
> fine. I have removed the WARN_ON from the code in my tree. I think we
> still don't want users to add quirks for such broken devices (as it would
> collide with hid_blakclist[] terminator), so I have left the initial
> condition in usbhid_modify_dquirk() untouched.
>
Thanks a lot for the explanation and the patch, now i better understand
the "problem". Sorry to have bother you with just noise. The patch will
certainly be of some help with dumb user (who have dump hardware )
like me.
I have very appreciate the attention you ( and all other from this feed ) have
take with me. So a big thanks for your work and the next time (if any), i
will try to better analyse the problem to avoid unnecessary work.
Vincent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
