Hi, Florian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:14 PM
> To: Zhang, Rui <[email protected]>; Rafal Milecki <[email protected]>
> Cc: Markus Mayer <[email protected]>; Eduardo Valentin
> <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Mark Rutland
> <[email protected]>; Doug Berger <[email protected]>; Brian
> Norris <[email protected]>; Gregory Fong
> <[email protected]>; Russell King <[email protected]>; Catalin
> Marinas <[email protected]>; Will Deacon <[email protected]>;
> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>; Olof Johansson <[email protected]>;
> Broadcom Kernel List <[email protected]>; Power
> Management List <[email protected]>; Device Tree List
> <[email protected]>; ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-
> [email protected]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> [email protected]>; Markus Mayer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] thermal: add brcmstb AVS TMON driver
> Importance: High
> 
> On 09/25/2017 08:02 PM, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Florian,
> >
> > This patch set was dropped in the last minute because of this
> > discussion https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9936325/
> > as I don’t want to rebase the patch before sending the pull request.
> 
> Ah, you wanted to squash that patch into the initial submission?
> 
> >
> > I don’t think we can make it for 4.14.
> > Eduardo will be back and pick the soc patches for 4.15.
> 
> I assume you would want to get that particular patch squashed into a clean
> submission targeting 4.15 now, right?
> 
Yes. As the patch in this thread has not been in upstream yet, I'd prefer the
fix/cleanup meld into the original patch before sending upstream.

Thanks,
Rui

> Thanks
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > rui
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 5:11 AM
> > To: Zhang, Rui <[email protected]>; Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Markus Mayer <[email protected]>; Eduardo Valentin
> > <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Mark
> Rutland
> > <[email protected]>; Doug Berger <[email protected]>; Brian
> Norris
> > <[email protected]>; Gregory Fong
> <[email protected]>;
> > Russell King <[email protected]>; Catalin Marinas
> > <[email protected]>; Will Deacon <[email protected]>; Arnd
> > Bergmann <[email protected]>; Olof Johansson <[email protected]>;
> Broadcom
> > Kernel List <[email protected]>; Power
> Management
> > List <[email protected]>; Device Tree List
> > <[email protected]>; ARM Kernel List
> > <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <[email protected]>; Markus Mayer <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] thermal: add brcmstb AVS TMON driver
> > Importance: High
> >
> > Le 08/14/17 à 23:48, Zhang Rui a écrit :
> >> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 08:42 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>> On 2017-08-15 08:08, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> >>>>> b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> >>>>> index 42c098e..c106a15 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig
> >>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ config BCM2835_THERMAL
> >>>>>         help
> >>>>>           Support for thermal sensors on Broadcom bcm2835 SoCs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +config BRCMSTB_THERMAL
> >>>>> +       tristate "Broadcom STB AVS TMON thermal driver"
> >>>>> +       depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB || COMPILE_TEST
> >>>>> +       help
> >>>>> +         Enable this driver if you have a Broadcom STB SoC and
> >>>>> would like
> >>>>> +         thermal framework support.
> >>>>> +
> >>>> I don't understand why I got the following checkpatch warning
> >>>>
> >>>> WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol
> >>>> fully
> >>>> #73: FILE: drivers/thermal/broadcom/Kconfig:9:
> >>>> +config BRCMSTB_THERMAL
> >>>>
> >>>> I didn't see this for other Kconfig changes.
> >>> It's because your help message is only 2 lines long (instead of 3).
> >>>
> >>> Some (many?) maintainers aren't pedantic about that, a common sense
> >>> should be applied ;)
> >>
> >> thanks for explaining.
> >> Patch 1 and 2 queued for next merge window.
> >
> > Humm, I don't see this driver in your latest 4.14 pull request to Linus, so
> what happened here exactly? Can we expect this driver to be submitted for
> 4.14 or we just happened to have missed this window now?
> > --
> > Florian
> >
> 
> --
> Florian

Reply via email to