On Sunday 29 April 2007, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: [...] >> > > CFS modifies the scheduler and nothing else, SD fiddles all over the >> > > kernel in interesting ways.
Huh? Doesn't grok. >> > Hmmm I guess you confused both of them this time. CFS touches many >> > places, which is why I think the testing coverage is still very low. SD >> > can be tested faster. My real concern is : are there still people >> > observing regressions with it ? If yes, they should be fixed before even >> > being merged. If no, why not merge it as a fix for the many known corner >> > cases of current scheduler ? After all, it's already in -mm. >> > >> > Willy >> >> Willy, you're making far too much sense. Are you replying to the correct >> mailing list? > >FWIW, I strongly agree with Willy. If we're putting it to a vote, I'm with Willy. But this is a dictatorship and we shouldn't forget it. :) -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) An ambassador is an honest man sent abroad to lie and intrigue for the benefit of his country. -- Sir Henry Wotton, 1568-1639 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/