On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:15:25PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Shuah Khan [email protected] wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ----- On Sep 26, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Shuah Khan [email protected] wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Mathew, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Test the new MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED and > >>>> MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED commands. > >>>> > >>>> Add checks expecting specific error values on system calls expected to > >>>> fail. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Boqun Feng <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Andrew Hunter <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Maged Michael <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: Avi Kivity <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Dave Watson <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Alan Stern <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Will Deacon <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> --- > >>>> .../testing/selftests/membarrier/membarrier_test.c | 109 > >>> > >>> Did you run get_maintainers script on this patch? I am curious why > >>> get_maintainers didn't include [email protected] and > >>> [email protected] > >> > >> My mistake. I'll add this script to my checklist before I send out > >> patches. > >> > >> If OK with you, I can just add the ML in CC here. > >> > > > > Please add everybody get_maintainers suggest for this patch as well. > > If this patch is going through linux-kselftest, you will have to resend the > > patch to me at some point, so I can pull it in. > > > > I am guessing this has dependency on the other patches in the series > > and will go through the primary tree. In that case CC is just fine and I > > will > > review it and Ack it. > > Indeed, it has a dependency on another patch part of this > series, which is aimed to go through Paul E. McKenney's tree. > > Adding Greg, Alice, and Paul Elder in CC as suggested by get_maintainers. > > Do you need me to re-send the series, or is this thread ok ?
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
