On 28/09/17 00:32, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/27, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> >> Well, the REQ_SEL should definitely be in the binding. >> >> Laxman, Stephen, what are your thoughts on the TRIG_SEL field? Looks > > Wrong Stephen?
Indeed! With all the folks in copy, I assumed we had the right one :-) Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
