On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:49:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Sure, but its still an officially supported GCC version. So either it > > must be made to work, or we must update the minimal GCC version > > requirements for the kernel. > > Of course! I just mean I'd not be surprised if this was a GCC bug/quirk > with legacy GCC versions that probably won't be fixed.
Ah, I recently had a case where this old GCC-4.4 crashed on 'obviously' broken code while newer GCC's somehow made it 'work'.
