On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:31:45AM +0000, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Sometimes, it gives a wrong scenario. For example: > > lock target > lock source > lock parent > lock target > lock parent of parent > lock parent > > lock parent of parent > unlock source > > We should consider this scenario as well so the report is always true > generally. >
Right, let me think about a proper way to do this.
Regards,
Boqun
> > + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
> > + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
> > } else {
> > printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n");
> > printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n");
> > --
> > 2.14.1
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
