Anton Blanchard writes: > I looked at this a while ago and my decision at the time was to keep the > old implementation around for a while and create two new ones that match > the x86 numbering: > > #define PTRACE_GETREGS 12 > #define PTRACE_SETREGS 13 > #define PTRACE_GETFPREGS 14 > #define PTRACE_SETFPREGS 15 > > I hate gratuitous differences, each ptrace app ends up with a sea of > ifdefs. > > Also I think it would be worth changing getregs/setregs to grab the > entire pt_regs structure. Otherwise most ops (gdb, strace etc) will just > have to make multiple ptrace calls to get the nia etc.
Did you do a patch to do that? Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
