[+akpm]
Hi Thunder,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:53:25PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> When I executed numactl -H(which read /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpumap
> and display cpumask_of_node for each node), but I got different result on
> X86 and arm64. For each numa node, the former only displayed online CPUs,
> and the latter displayed all possible CPUs. Unfortunately, both Linux
> documentation and numactl manual have not described it clear.
>
> I sent a mail to ask for help, and Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org> replied
> that he preferred to print online cpus because it doesn't really make much
> sense to bind anything on offline nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Which tree is this intended to go through? I'm happy to take it via arm64,
but I don't want to tread on anybody's toes in linux-next and it looks like
there are already queued changes to this file via Andrew's tree.
Will
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 3855902..aae2402 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -27,13 +27,21 @@ static struct bus_type node_subsys = {
>
> static ssize_t node_read_cpumap(struct device *dev, bool list, char *buf)
> {
> + ssize_t n;
> + cpumask_var_t mask;
> struct node *node_dev = to_node(dev);
> - const struct cpumask *mask = cpumask_of_node(node_dev->dev.id);
>
> /* 2008/04/07: buf currently PAGE_SIZE, need 9 chars per 32 bits. */
> BUILD_BUG_ON((NR_CPUS/32 * 9) > (PAGE_SIZE-1));
>
> - return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, mask);
> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> + return 0;
> +
> + cpumask_and(mask, cpumask_of_node(node_dev->dev.id), cpu_online_mask);
> + n = cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, mask);
> + free_cpumask_var(mask);
> +
> + return n;
> }
>
> static inline ssize_t node_read_cpumask(struct device *dev,
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
