On Mon 02-10-17 13:47:12, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 02:24:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > I believe the latest version (v9) looks sensible from the semantic point > > of view and we should focus on making it into a mergeable shape. > > The only thing is that after some additional thinking I don't think anymore > that implicit propagation of oom_group is a good idea.
It would be better to discuss this under the v9 thread. This one is already quite convoluted IMHO. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
