Em Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 07:47:52AM -0700, [email protected] escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
> 
> Add two locks to protect namespaces_list and comm_list.
> 
> The lock is only needed for multithreaded code, so using mutex wrappers
> provided by perf tool.
> 
> Not all the comm_list/namespaces_list accessing are protected, e.g.
> thread__exec_comm. Because the multithread code for perf top event
> synthesizing does not touch them. They don't need a lock.

They don't need a lock _now_, ok I think we can proceed that way, this
cset should serve as a warning to people working in further
multithreading perf.

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/thread.c | 53 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  tools/perf/util/thread.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> index c09bdb5..bf73117 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ struct thread *thread__new(pid_t pid, pid_t tid)
>               thread->cpu = -1;
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->namespaces_list);
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->comm_list);
> +             init_rwsem(&thread->namespaces_lock);
> +             init_rwsem(&thread->comm_lock);
>  
>               comm_str = malloc(32);
>               if (!comm_str)
> @@ -83,18 +85,26 @@ void thread__delete(struct thread *thread)
>               map_groups__put(thread->mg);
>               thread->mg = NULL;
>       }
> +     down_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(namespaces, tmp_namespaces,
>                                &thread->namespaces_list, list) {
>               list_del(&namespaces->list);
>               namespaces__free(namespaces);
>       }
> +     up_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
> +
> +     down_write(&thread->comm_lock);
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(comm, tmp_comm, &thread->comm_list, list) {
>               list_del(&comm->list);
>               comm__free(comm);
>       }
> +     up_write(&thread->comm_lock);
> +
>       unwind__finish_access(thread);
>       nsinfo__zput(thread->nsinfo);
>  
> +     exit_rwsem(&thread->namespaces_lock);
> +     exit_rwsem(&thread->comm_lock);
>       free(thread);
>  }
>  
> @@ -125,8 +135,8 @@ struct namespaces *thread__namespaces(const struct thread 
> *thread)
>       return list_first_entry(&thread->namespaces_list, struct namespaces, 
> list);
>  }
>  
> -int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
> -                        struct namespaces_event *event)
> +static int __thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
> +                                 struct namespaces_event *event)
>  {
>       struct namespaces *new, *curr = thread__namespaces(thread);
>  
> @@ -149,6 +159,17 @@ int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 
> timestamp,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
> +                        struct namespaces_event *event)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     down_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
> +     ret = __thread__set_namespaces(thread, timestamp, event);
> +     up_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  struct comm *thread__comm(const struct thread *thread)
>  {
>       if (list_empty(&thread->comm_list))
> @@ -170,8 +191,8 @@ struct comm *thread__exec_comm(const struct thread 
> *thread)
>       return last;
>  }
>  
> -int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
> -                    bool exec)
> +static int ____thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str,
> +                             u64 timestamp, bool exec)
>  {
>       struct comm *new, *curr = thread__comm(thread);
>  
> @@ -195,6 +216,17 @@ int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char 
> *str, u64 timestamp,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
> +                    bool exec)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     down_write(&thread->comm_lock);
> +     ret = ____thread__set_comm(thread, str, timestamp, exec);
> +     up_write(&thread->comm_lock);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int thread__set_comm_from_proc(struct thread *thread)
>  {
>       char path[64];
> @@ -212,7 +244,7 @@ int thread__set_comm_from_proc(struct thread *thread)
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> -const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
> +static const char *__thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
>  {
>       const struct comm *comm = thread__comm(thread);
>  
> @@ -222,6 +254,17 @@ const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
>       return comm__str(comm);
>  }
>  
> +const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
> +{
> +     const char *str;
> +
> +     down_read((struct rw_semaphore *)&thread->comm_lock);
> +     str = __thread__comm_str(thread);
> +     up_read((struct rw_semaphore *)&thread->comm_lock);
> +
> +     return str;
> +}
> +
>  /* CHECKME: it should probably better return the max comm len from its comm 
> list */
>  int thread__comm_len(struct thread *thread)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.h b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
> index cb1a5dd..10555d6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include "symbol.h"
>  #include <strlist.h>
>  #include <intlist.h>
> +#include "rwsem.h"
>  
>  struct thread_stack;
>  struct unwind_libunwind_ops;
> @@ -29,7 +30,9 @@ struct thread {
>       int                     comm_len;
>       bool                    dead; /* if set thread has exited */
>       struct list_head        namespaces_list;
> +     struct rw_semaphore     namespaces_lock;
>       struct list_head        comm_list;
> +     struct rw_semaphore     comm_lock;
>       u64                     db_id;
>  
>       void                    *priv;
> -- 
> 2.5.5

Reply via email to