On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 03:51:02PM +0000, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Some gpio-keys definitions in our DTs were having buttons defined with a
> > unit-address and that would generate a DTC warning.
> >
> > Change the buttons node names to remove the warnings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-inet9f-rev03.dts | 40 ++++++++++-----------
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-pcduino.dts | 6 +--
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-inet9f-rev03.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-inet9f-rev03.dts
> > index 7c7f12132ea3..13224f5ac166 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-inet9f-rev03.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10-inet9f-rev03.dts
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > poll-interval = <20>;
> >
> > - button@0 {
> > + left-joystick-left {
>
> Does this fit the naming scheme? Should we have "-button" suffices?The example binding of gpio-keys just have the key name as node name, just like most of the DT out there I could find. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
