Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-10-06 10:06:37) > stop_machine is not really a locking primitive we should use, except > when the hw folks tell us the hw is broken and that's the only way to > work around it. > > This patch tries to address the locking abuse of stop_machine() from > > commit 20e4933c478a1ca694b38fa4ac44d99e659941f5 > Author: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Tue Nov 22 14:41:21 2016 +0000 > > drm/i915: Stop the machine as we install the wedged submit_request handler > > Chris said parts of the reasons for going with stop_machine() was that > it's no overhead for the fast-path. But these callbacks use irqsave > spinlocks and do a bunch of MMIO, and rcu_read_lock is _real_ fast. > > To stay as close as possible to the stop_machine semantics we first > update all the submit function pointers to the nop handler, then call > synchronize_rcu() to make sure no new requests can be submitted. This > should give us exactly the huge barrier we want. > > I pondered whether we should annotate engine->submit_request as __rcu > and use rcu_assign_pointer and rcu_dereference on it. But the reason > behind those is to make sure the compiler/cpu barriers are there for > when you have an actual data structure you point at, to make sure all > the writes are seen correctly on the read side. But we just have a > function pointer, and .text isn't changed, so no need for these > barriers and hence no need for annotations. > > This should fix the followwing lockdep splat: > > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 4.14.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_3179+ #1 Tainted: G U > ------------------------------------------------------ > kworker/3:4/562 is trying to acquire lock: > (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: [<ffffffff8113d4bc>] > stop_machine+0x1c/0x40 > > but task is already holding lock: > (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0136588>] > i915_reset_device+0x1e8/0x260 [i915] > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #6 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9b0 > mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x1b/0x20 > i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x51/0x130 [i915] > i915_gem_fault+0x209/0x650 [i915] > __do_fault+0x1e/0x80 > __handle_mm_fault+0xa08/0xed0 > handle_mm_fault+0x156/0x300 > __do_page_fault+0x2c5/0x570 > do_page_fault+0x28/0x250 > page_fault+0x22/0x30 > > -> #5 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > __might_fault+0x68/0x90 > _copy_to_user+0x23/0x70 > filldir+0xa5/0x120 > dcache_readdir+0xf9/0x170 > iterate_dir+0x69/0x1a0 > SyS_getdents+0xa5/0x140 > entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1 > > -> #4 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: > down_write+0x3b/0x70 > handle_create+0xcb/0x1e0 > devtmpfsd+0x139/0x180 > kthread+0x152/0x190 > ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 > > -> #3 ((complete)&req.done){+.+.}: > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > wait_for_common+0x58/0x210 > wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20 > devtmpfs_create_node+0x13d/0x160 > device_add+0x5eb/0x620 > device_create_groups_vargs+0xe0/0xf0 > device_create+0x3a/0x40 > msr_device_create+0x2b/0x40 > cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc9/0xbf0 > cpuhp_thread_fun+0x17b/0x240 > smpboot_thread_fn+0x18a/0x280 > kthread+0x152/0x190 > ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 > > -> #2 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > cpuhp_issue_call+0x133/0x1c0 > __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x139/0x2a0 > __cpuhp_setup_state+0x46/0x60 > page_writeback_init+0x43/0x67 > pagecache_init+0x3d/0x42 > start_kernel+0x3a8/0x3fc > x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > x86_64_start_kernel+0x6d/0x70 > verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb > > -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > __mutex_lock+0x86/0x9b0 > mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 > __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x53/0x2a0 > __cpuhp_setup_state+0x46/0x60 > page_alloc_init+0x28/0x30 > start_kernel+0x145/0x3fc > x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > x86_64_start_kernel+0x6d/0x70 > verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb > > -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: > check_prev_add+0x430/0x840 > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0 > stop_machine+0x1c/0x40 > i915_gem_set_wedged+0x1a/0x20 [i915] > i915_reset+0xb9/0x230 [i915] > i915_reset_device+0x1f6/0x260 [i915] > i915_handle_error+0x2d8/0x430 [i915] > hangcheck_declare_hang+0xd3/0xf0 [i915] > i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x262/0x2d0 [i915] > process_one_work+0x233/0x660 > worker_thread+0x4e/0x3b0 > kthread+0x152/0x190 > ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Chain exists of: > cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> &mm->mmap_sem --> &dev->struct_mutex > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > lock(&mm->mmap_sem); > lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 3 locks held by kworker/3:4/562: > #0: ("events_long"){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109c64a>] > process_one_work+0x1aa/0x660 > #1: ((&(&i915->gpu_error.hangcheck_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: > [<ffffffff8109c64a>] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x660 > #2: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0136588>] > i915_reset_device+0x1e8/0x260 [i915] > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 3 PID: 562 Comm: kworker/3:4 Tainted: G U > 4.14.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_3179+ #1 > Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS > BNKBL357.86A.0048.2017.0704.1415 07/04/2017 > Workqueue: events_long i915_hangcheck_elapsed [i915] > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x68/0x9f > print_circular_bug+0x235/0x3c0 > ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 > check_prev_add+0x430/0x840 > ? irq_work_queue+0x86/0xe0 > ? wake_up_klogd+0x53/0x70 > __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > ? __lock_acquire+0x1420/0x15e0 > ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 > lock_acquire+0xb0/0x200 > ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x40 > ? i915_gem_object_truncate+0x50/0x50 [i915] > cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0 > ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x40 > stop_machine+0x1c/0x40 > i915_gem_set_wedged+0x1a/0x20 [i915] > i915_reset+0xb9/0x230 [i915] > i915_reset_device+0x1f6/0x260 [i915] > ? gen8_gt_irq_ack+0x170/0x170 [i915] > ? work_on_cpu_safe+0x60/0x60 > i915_handle_error+0x2d8/0x430 [i915] > ? vsnprintf+0xd1/0x4b0 > ? scnprintf+0x3a/0x70 > hangcheck_declare_hang+0xd3/0xf0 [i915] > ? intel_runtime_pm_put+0x56/0xa0 [i915] > i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x262/0x2d0 [i915] > process_one_work+0x233/0x660 > worker_thread+0x4e/0x3b0 > kthread+0x152/0x190 > ? process_one_work+0x660/0x660 > ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 > ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 > Setting dangerous option reset - tainting kernel > i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang > Setting dangerous option reset - tainting kernel > i915 0000:00:02.0: Resetting chip after gpu hang > > v2: Have 1 global synchronize_rcu() barrier across all engines, and > improve commit message. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102886 > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103096 > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 31 > +++++++++-------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_request.c | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index ab8c6946fea4..e79a6ca60265 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -3020,16 +3020,8 @@ static void nop_submit_request(struct > drm_i915_gem_request *request) > intel_engine_init_global_seqno(request->engine, > request->global_seqno); > } > > -static void engine_set_wedged(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) > +static void engine_complete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) > { > - /* We need to be sure that no thread is running the old callback as > - * we install the nop handler (otherwise we would submit a request > - * to hardware that will never complete). In order to prevent this > - * race, we wait until the machine is idle before making the swap > - * (using stop_machine()). > - */ > - engine->submit_request = nop_submit_request; > - > /* Mark all executing requests as skipped */ > engine->cancel_requests(engine);
How are we planning to serialise the intel_engine_init_global_seqno() here with the in-flight nop_submit? With sufficient thrust we will get a stale breadcrumb and an incomplete request. -Chris