On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 11:56:17AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 6, 2017, at 3:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.54 release.
> > There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Oct  8 08:37:55 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >     kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.54-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> > linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> From Linaro’s validation farm we have the following test results for this 
> 4.9.54-rc1. TI's 32 bit arm board the X15 is a new addition.  Also this time 
> around more of LTP is being run. There is triage to do and you’ll notice that 
> I’m differentiating between ‘known failures’ and ‘failures’ in the data 
> below. The later obviously will get looked at so we can graduate failures to 
> known failures/fixes and improve finding regressions. (Anyone want to help?) 
> In summary I wouldn’t hold up 4.9.54 based on the failures in the new data 
> below.  Given it’s a Sat, the Mrs has plans, I’ve no time to do further 
> digging until later.

/me hands Tom some '\n' characters...

:)

> kernel: 4.9.54-rc1
> git repo: 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.9.y
> git commit: 1852eae92c460813692808234da35d142a405ab7
> git describe: v4.9.53
> Test details: 
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.53
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.52-65-gaceea42c68d9)

How did your arm64 test build?  There was a build regression in the -rc1
release, are you sure you actually ran the correct image?

Thanks for testing this, finding out the root of these problems this
week would be great.

greg k-h

Reply via email to